Right here, right now, I'm endorsing Bill Ritter for re-election as governor.
The Republicans made me do it.
The news today, according to the banner headline across the front page of the Denver Post, is "United GOP targets Ritter."
And right below that headline the Post encapsulates the Colorado Republican Party's 2010 "Contract for Colorado," which leads off with the promise (I would call it a threat) to "Limit taxes and state spending."
As if the perennially Republican-defended Taxpayers Bill of Rights didn't already prohibitively limit Colorado's business growth and progress.
As if the perennial Republican criticism of Amendment 23, the only bulwark against legislative raids on public-school funding for the state, were not promise enough from their party that the children of Colorado can be ignored in order to uphold the wealth of the establishment.
No, none of that has been enough for Republicans in Colorado.
Now, they want to re-impose a "limited-government, no-government" regime on the state, apparently not satisfied with the deep hole the former Owens administration dug for Colorado through its frivolus spending on inefficient computers, its promotion of an Internet network that failed to deliver on its promises, its complete abrogation of public health programs and higher-education funding, and its total disregard for racial discrimination in state contracting.
That was once Colorado's contract with Republicans.
I, for one, would rather see Democrats in charge of making government mistakes.
At least they err on the side of ordinary people.